标题: 从社造到社运: 美里庄环境保育联盟反118关西外环道事件研究
From Community Empowerment to Social Movement: Mei Li Zhuang Environmental Protection Union A research on protest to Guanxi No.118 Bypass Routes
作者: 陈玉蟾
Chen,Yu-Chan
罗烈师
Lo,Lieh-Shih
客家文化学院客家社会与文化学程
关键字: 关西;外环道;社会运动;美里庄;Guanxi;bypass routes;social movement;Mei-Li-Zhuang
公开日期: 2015
摘要: 位于新竹县东北隅的关西镇地形地貌多样,是属于“内山开发”的客家小镇。新竹县第二大河凤山溪流经街区南边,此区凤山溪河谷冲积平原经客家先民荜路蓝缕辛勤拓垦,成为最肥沃大面积的美丽田园,并有丰富的客家文化地景。
新竹县政府为改善交通,拟于凤山溪沿岸河谷平原兴建“118线关西外环道”。“美里庄环境保育联盟”认为辟建外环道代价高效益低,且对关西镇肥沃良田、美好景观以及文化地景造成不可回复之负面影响;公开呼吁政府停建外环道并采取公民行动,经过二年的努力,118外环道工程计画搁置。
作者以“行动主义者”精神,持续关心外环道工程四年,号召并参与组织行动二年。故本论文乃一个事件当事人回望反思为主,参酌中外社运理论检视与分析为辅。
本研究提出三点结论:对于关西发展的愿景镇民意见分歧,反外环道事件只是凸显分歧事实;“美里庄”的胜利,其实是政治人物审酌现实环境的策略考量而获得;反对“发展性建设”,采取社会运动途径代价高,难以获得持一般“发展观”镇民认同,应循公民参与的途径较务实。
Guanxi Township, which is located northeast of Hsinchu county has a variety of different landscapes, and is also a near-mountain developed small Hakka town. Feng-Shan Creek, the second-biggest river of Hsinchu County streams through the south side of Guanxi downtown, and had formed a rich alluvial plain. Over the years, the Hakka ancestors had worked very hard and build a large and beautiful rice field with abundant Hakka landscapes and views.
The Hsinchu county government had planned to build the Guanxi No. 118 Bypass Routes on the Feng-Shan Creek alluvial plain in order to improve the traffic situation. Mei-Li-Zhuang Environmental Protection Union (MLZEPU) believed that this construction would cost a lot and benefit little, and would cause irreversible negative impacts on the high quality rice field, beautiful views and cultural landscapes in Guanxi. Therefore, the union had appealed to the government to stop the construction and taken civil action. After two years of protest, the No. 118 Bypass Routes construction had been shelved.
The author had paid attention on the bypass routes construction case during the past four years and had called, organized and participated the movement during the past two years with spirit of an activist. Thus, this thesis is firstly an organization and reflection of the activist, and secondly an attempt to analyze and understand the movement with Taiwanese and Western social movement theories.
This thesis proposes three arguments: (1) Guanxi citizens have very different opinions and visions on the direction of future development of this small town, and the protest has simply reflected the difference; (2) The seeming “victory” of MLZEPU was in fact gained by politicians’ strategic moves based on reality; (3) the movement would have been much easier if MLZEPU took the civil participation approach instead of social movement approach; the movement was against the developmental or constructive view and therefore was difficult for most citizens (who are usually all for development) to identify or support.
URI: http://140.113.39.130/cdrfb3/record/nctu/#GT070155511
http://hdl.handle.net/11536/126343
显示于类别:Thesis