标题: | 面向海洋,成为西洋:“海国”想像与日本的亚洲论述 |
作者: | 蓝弘岳 |
关键字: | 日本;西洋;海国;海权;亚洲论述;Japan;the West;maritime nation;sea power;discours e of Asia |
公开日期: | 1-六月-2012 |
出版社: | 国立阳明交通大学出版社 National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University Press |
摘要: | 本文将从“陆权国家”与“海权国家”斗争的世界史构想出发,从18、19世纪日本知识人话语中,去看日本如何从一个“岛国”变成向外开放的商业文明的“海国”乃至“海权国家”,及最后欲成为“陆权国家”而终至失败的过程。主要以厘清日本之“海国”想像知识系谱,以及进一步探究日本的“海国”想像与其在近代亚洲的扩张之关连为论文目的。因为日本从自觉其为“海国”开始,逐渐不再以“岛国”之姿模仿彼岸“陆国”之政治与军事等的制度,而是改以渡海而来的西方国家为典范,向其周边的海洋、大陆与岛屿扩张。就此意义而言,近代日本的“海国”想像是与亚洲大陆的“陆国”差异化,其脱亚意识的根源之一。另一方面,当日本企图以“海国”之姿展开扩张之时,其所能扩张的范围亦只有亚洲的近邻诸邦而已,是以“海国”的想像、建构与欲成为“海权国家”与“陆权国家”的亚洲论述缠绕在一起。也就是说,“海国”想像与“脱亚”思想、扩张主义型亚洲论述等三种思想复杂地交错在一起。本文欲从思想史的角度,厘清此一交错的思想状况。藉此,希望能对亚洲主义的形成与发展开提供—思考方向。又,此一复杂的思想状况当从江户思想史的内部来探究起的,故本文将检讨林子平、本多利明等江户后期思想家的言论,然后探讨福泽谕吉等明治思想家与亚洲主义团体东邦协会相关之诸种“海国”想像与其亚洲论述。而且,亦将讨论东邦协会所译介马汉(Alfred Thayer Mahan)的《海权论》(The Influence of Sea Power upon History,1660-1783)与近代日本之亚洲论述的关连。 When European maritime powers occupied most of sea spaces, they began to trade with Asian countries, and gradually to colonization of large areas of land in the 18th and 19th centuries. In the meantime, the border was invented in the Asia, and a few Japanese intellectuals gradually started to argued about the border of Japan, to recognize Japan's characteristics and advantages as a maritime nation (海国).And they imaged Japan as a maritime nation as a way to make differences from China. So In the 18th century, a few Japanese intellectuals who imaged Japan as a maritime nation no longer imitated the political and military systems of continental nations (陆国, notably China); rather, they took the Western maritime powers as a model to build the nation and expand territories. In this sense, to imagine Japan itself as a maritime nation was a step, or maybe a turning point, in Japan's attempt to de-Asianize (Escape from Asia, 脱亚), also, it was a step in the development of the Asianism (especially of those expansionist thoughts of Asianism).That is to say, the cultural border between Europe and Asia was invented by the modern Japanese intellectuals, at the same time, they break the border of the Asian nations to become the west. So In this paper, I would like to argue that Japan's imagination of being a maritime nation was an important factor in Asianism's emergence in modern Japan. For this purpose, I will examine the discourses of Japanese intellectuals concerned with building up Japan as a maritime nation from the 18th century. And then I will discuss Afred Thayer Mahan's sea power theory served as one of the factors that lead to the emphasis on military overseas expansion in Japan's (expanisionist) Asiaism. At last, as China is urging to get the sea power of the Asia-Pacific region, want to rebuild China as a maritime nation recently. I will discuss the conflict of the two maritime nations in the border of seas. |
URI: | http://dx.doi.org/10.6752/jcs.201206_(14).0009 http://hdl.handle.net/11536/157764 |
ISSN: | 1816-0514 |
DOI: | 10.6752/jcs.201206_(14).0009 |
期刊: | 文化研究 Router: A Journal of Cultural Studies |
Issue: | 14 |
起始页: | 273 |
结束页: | 315 |
显示于类别: | Router: A Journal of Cultural Studies |
文件中的档案:
If it is a zip file, please download the file and unzip it, then open index.html in a browser to view the full text content.