Note on "Wash criterion in analytic hierarchy process"

doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2006.12.043

完整後設資料紀錄

DC 欄位	值	語言
dc.contributor.author	Lin, Jennifer Shu-Jen	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Chou, Shuo-Yan	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Chouhuang, Wayne T.	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Hsu, C. P.	en_US
dc.date.accessioned	2014-12-08T15:12:35Z	-
dc.date.available	2014-12-08T15:12:35Z	-
dc.date.issued	2008-02-16	en_US
dc.identifier.issn	0377-2217	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2006.12.043	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/11536/9666	-
dc.description.abstract	The paper of Finan and Hurley - published in Computers and Operations Research (2002) - was re-examined, where they discussed a seemingly contradictory phenomenon resulting from the ignoring of wash criteria in the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). With that, they raised a serious challenge to the AHP methodology. However, by reviewing their arguments and example data, analyses regarding to their propositions and numerical example are presented in this paper to counter their challenge. (c) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.	en_US
dc.language.iso	en_US	en_US
dc.subject	decision analysis	en_US
dc.subject	analytic hierarchy process (AHP)	en_US
dc.subject	rank reversal	en_US
dc.subject	wash criterion	en_US
dc.title	Note on "Wash criterion in analytic hierarchy process"	en_US
dc.type	Article	en_US
dc.identifier.doi	10.1016/j.ejor.2006.12.043	en_US
dc.identifier.journal	EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH	en_US
dc.citation.volume	185	en_US
dc.citation.issue	1	en_US
dc.citation.spage	444	en_US
dc.citation.epage	447	en_US
dc.contributor.department	科技管理研究所	zh_TW
dc.contributor.department	Institute of Management of Technology	en_US
dc.identifier.wosnumber	WOS:000250258400029	-
dc.citation.woscount	2	-
顯示於類別：	期刊論文

文件中的檔案：

000250258400029.pdf

若為 zip 檔案，請下載檔案解壓縮後，用瀏覽器開啟資料夾中的 index.html 瀏覽全文。